- Indico style
- Indico style - inline minutes
- Indico style - numbered
- Indico style - numbered + minutes
- Indico Weeks View
Overview
• Examples of related projects:
o OECD, CODATA, etc
o Europe (EOSC and RDA)
o Korea
o France
o Switzerland
o Austria
1. Identify your initiative as a stakeholder (researchers, policymakers, ICT specialists, academic institutions, citizens, industries, etc.);
2. Analyze how your initiative addresses a multiplicity of different cultural contexts, practices, approaches and the relative technical languages.
3. Assess the proactive role (if any) of your initiative with respect to interoperability of open science repositories
• Open discussion:
A - Diversity
1. Who are the key actors for the deployment of Open Science repositories?
2. Is it possible to broadly categorize the type of information in Open Science repositories (Big-Science/Research, Citizen demographics, Social and Human Sciences, Law Studies, Cultural Heritage, Health, Environment, etc.)?
3. Can the above disparate communities use a common infrastructure?
4. What is the role of private companies and societal organisations?
B - Interoperability / Data handling
1. What are the lessons learnt from Big Science experiments that can be applied to “Long Tail of Science” groups?
2. What are the technical/political challenges to achieve full interoperability among Open Science repositories?
3. What is the correct granularity needed to define metadata semantics to satisfy the different community requirements?
4. What is the role of Data Stewardship?
5. Who owns the data?
6. Who is entitled to provide the certification of the quality of an Open Science repository?
• Proposed structure and discussion
• Is the proposed structure responding to demand?
• Open discussion
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats of the proposed structure. Round table discussion (oral contributions)