Piezoelectric response of K0.5Na0.5NbO3 designed by sintering engineering

11 Sept 2019, 15:55
10m
Student Communication Afternoon Session 1

Speaker

Mariana Gomes (IFIMUP-IN, Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Department of Physics and Astronomy of Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal )

Description

Since the discovery of the piezoelectric properties of lead zirconate-titanate (PZT) solid solution, namely near its morphotropic phase boundary region (MPB), those materials exhibiting piezoelectricity have been largely studied, wherein PZT still stands as a prototype for electromechanical applications. However, lead based materials are poisonous in nature and thus they should be substitute for lead-free materials to assure sustainability. Though lead-based materials have higher piezoelectric response, there are other promising friendly environment compounds, namely KxNa(1-x)NbO3 [1]. For x=0.5 (0.5KNN), the high-temperature cubic symmetry changes to a non-symmetric ferroelectric tetragonal structure at T3=700 K. At T2=465 K it becomes orthorhombic, stabilizing in a rhombohedral symmetry below T1=135 K [2]. Recently, theoretical calculations have predicted piezoelectric response enhancement when T3 become closer to T2. Moreover, it has been suggested that sintering conditions can act significantly on the magnitude of the [T2, T3] interval. To unravel the effect of sintering conditions in 0.5KNN, ceramics were prepared by conventional sintering (CS), spark plasma sintering (SPS), and spark plasma texturing (SPT). XRD data at room conditions revealed that the two latter methods yield 0.08 and 0.16 GPa of internal stresses, respectively. It is worth emphasizing, that the emergence of theses stresses have strong repercussions on the values of the piezoelectric coefficient d33, increasing from 50 to 125 pC.N-1 for SPS and SPT samples, respectively [3].
In this work, we present a detailed, temperature dependent, lattice dynamic study of 0.5KNN ceramics produced by the three sintering methods referred to above, using Raman spectroscopy. For the three types of sintered samples, we have observed clear critical temperature shifts, and specific different modes behaviors at T1, T2 and T3. To corroborate this outcome, the temperature dependence of the polar and dielectric properties of the CS, SPS and SPT samples was studied using pyroelectric and dielectric techniques. The obtained results are discussed towards disentangling how the sintering methods tailor the piezoelectric response, in order to provide competitive lead-free materials.

[1] I. Coondoo et al., J. Advanced Dielectrics, 03, 1330002 (2013)
[2] B. Orayech et al., J. Appl. Cryst., 48, 318-333 (2015)
[3] R. Pinho et al., paper to be submitted

Topic 2. Multiferroics and ferroelectrics

Primary authors

Mariana Gomes (IFIMUP-IN, Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Department of Physics and Astronomy of Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal ) Prof. Joaquim Agostinho Moreira (IFIMUP-IN, Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Department of Physics and Astronomy of Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal ) Prof. Abílio Almeida (IFIMUP-IN, Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Department of Physics and Astronomy of Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal ) Dr Rui Vilarinho (IFIMUP-IN, Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Department of Physics and Astronomy of Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal ) Prof. Paula Vilarinho (CICECO, Center for Research in Ceramics and Composite Materials, Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering, University of Aveiro, Portugal) Mr Rui Pinho (CICECO, Center for Research in Ceramics and Composite Materials, Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering, University of Aveiro, Portugal)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.