May 17 – 20, 2015
La Biodola, Isola d'Elba
Europe/Rome timezone

Establishment of an open database of realistic simulated data for evaluation of partial volume correction techniques in brain PET/MR

May 20, 2015, 11:00 AM
1h 30m
Room Maria Luisa

Room Maria Luisa

Poster 3 - Advances in MR-PET and MR-SPECT software and quantification Session 11 - Poster Session II

Speaker

Ana Mota (Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, FC-UL, Lisboa, Portugal; Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCL, London, UK)

Description

The Partial Volume (PV) effect in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging leads to loss in quantification accuracy, which manifests in PV effects (small objects occupy partially the sensitive volume of the imaging instrument, resulting in blurred images). Simultaneous acquisition of PET and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) produces concurrent metabolic and anatomical information. The latter has proved to be very helpful for the correction of PV effects. Currently, there are several techniques used for PV correction. They can be applied directly during the reconstruction process or as a post-processing step after image reconstruction. In order to evaluate the efficacy of the different PV correction techniques in brain-PET, we are constructing a database of simulated data. Here we present the framework and steps involved in constructing this database. Static 18F-FDG epilepsy and 18F-Florbetapir amyloid dementia PET/MR were selected because of their very different characteristics. The methodology followed was based on four main steps: Image pre-processing, Ground Truth (GT) generation, MRI and PET data simulation and reconstruction. All steps used Open Source software and can therefore be repeated at any centre. The framework as well as the database will be freely accessible. Tools used included GIF, FSL, POSSUM, GATE and STIR. The final data obtained after simulation, involving raw or reconstructed PET data together with corresponding MRI datasets, were close to the original patient data. Besides, there is the advantage that data can be compared with the GT. We indicate several parameters that can be improved and optimized.

Primary author

Ana Mota (Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, FC-UL, Lisboa, Portugal; Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCL, London, UK)

Co-authors

Brian Hutton (Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCL, London, UK) Ivana Drobnjak (Centre of Medical Image Computing, UCL, London, UK) John Dickson (Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCL Hospital Trust, London, UK) Jonathan Schott (Dementia Research Centre, UCL, London, UK) Jorge M. Cardoso (Centre for Medical Image Computing, UCL, London, UK) Julien Bert (INSERM UMR1101, LaTIM, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France) Kjell Erlandsson (Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCL, London, UK) Kris Thielemans (Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCL, London, UK) Marc Modat (Centre for Medical Image Computing, UCL, London, UK) Ninon Burgos (Centre for Medical Image Computing, UCL, London, UK) Sebastien Ourselin (Centre for Medical Image Computing, UCL, London, UK) Vesna Cuplov (Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCL, London, UK)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.